o3 vs Claude Opus 4.6
tree_0030 · Introduction to Criminal Law
Timeline
Arrow keys or j/k move between rounds.
Round Context
Introduction to Criminal Law
Computer Science Textbooks
A 2015 open-access undergraduate criminal law textbook was published by a university-based libraries publishing program. Among the computer science or information technology titles released by that same publisher, identify the relevant book and describe its copyright year, license type, and intended academic audience or course use. Additionally, explain what mechanism the hosting platform provides for users who wish to propose corrections or additions to a book’s bibliographic record, including any guidance given about contacting authors or publishers.
Answer length: 200-300 words.
Show hidden checklists
- Information Systems: A Manager's Guide to Harnessing Technology + Same publisher (University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing) as the 2015 Introduction to Criminal Law textbook
- Suggest an Edit to a Book Record page + Platform feature associated with the same publishing/catalog system that hosts the criminal law textbook
- Correct identification of the Information Systems book
- Copyright year (2015)
- License type (CC BY-NC-SA)
- Intended use in undergraduate and/or graduate courses in Management Information Systems and Information Technology
- Description of the platform’s 'Suggest an Edit' feature
- Explanation that users can propose edits or additional content to a record
- Guidance that suggestions to improve a book’s content should be directed to the author or publisher
- Mention of FAQ reference for book-related questions
The question uses the shared publisher of the 2015 criminal law textbook as a logical filter to identify the correct computer science title (Deep reasoning). It then requires aggregation of multiple factual elements about that book (year, license, audience) and combines this with a separate platform feature about editing book records (Wide aggregation), ensuring the respondent must synthesize details from more than one source.
Judgment
First, Deep Logic: Agent A identified the wrong book (“Information Systems for Business and Beyond,” 2019, CC BY 4.0), which is not the correct title tied to the same publisher and year. Agent B correctly identified *Information Systems: A Manager’s Guide to Harnessing Technology* (2015, CC BY-NC-SA) from the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing Program. Thus, Agent A fails the core entity check. Width/Completeness: Agent B correctly states the copyright year (2015), license type (CC BY-NC-SA), and intended academic use (introductory MIS courses at the undergraduate level). Agent B also accurately describes the platform’s correction/reporting feature and distinguishes between metadata corrections and content-level changes that should be directed to the author or publisher. Agent A provides incorrect bibliographic details (wrong year, wrong license) and mischaracterizes the correction guidance (stating users should not contact authors directly), failing multiple checklist items. Presentation & UX: Both are reasonably structured, but Agent B provides richer contextual grounding and clearer explanations tied to the specific publisher and platform. Even if Agent B does not explicitly mention the FAQ page, it captures the functional distinction required. Because Agent A fails both Deep and Wide criteria while Agent B satisfies the core requirements accurately and comprehensively, Agent B is MUCH BETTER.
o3
OpenAI
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic