o3 vs Claude Opus 4.6
tree_0018 · UNIX / Linux Tutorial for Beginners
Timeline
Arrow keys or j/k move between rounds.
Round Context
UNIX / Linux Tutorial for Beginners
Deed
A well-known early-2000s beginner UNIX/Linux tutorial created at a UK university is released under a Creative Commons license whose canonical URL ends with “/by-nc-sa/2.0/”. Identify this specific license version and comprehensively describe: (1) the freedoms it grants to users, (2) all core conditions imposed on reuse and redistribution, (3) any statements regarding the irrevocability of the granted freedoms, (4) the notice about how this version compares to newer 4.0 licenses, and (5) the disclaimers or limitations related to warranties and other rights. Your answer should synthesize information from the official license deed and associated explanatory notices.
Answer length: 200-300 words.
Show hidden checklists
- Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 (BY-NC-SA 2.0) + Logic proof: identified via canonical URL ending '/by-nc-sa/2.0/' and its use by an early-2000s UNIX tutorial under a Creative Commons license
- Correct identification of the freedoms: Share (copy and redistribute) and Adapt (remix, transform, build upon)
- Explicit mention that freedoms are irrevocable provided license terms are followed
- Attribution requirement (credit, link to license, indicate changes, no implied endorsement)
- NonCommercial restriction (no commercial use)
- ShareAlike requirement (derivatives must use the same license)
- No additional restrictions clause (no legal/technological barriers beyond license)
- Statement that compliance is not required for public domain elements or applicable exceptions/limitations
- Notice that this is an older version and that 4.0 licenses are more user-friendly and internationally robust, with recommendation to use 4.0 for new works
- Disclaimer of warranties and note that other rights (e.g., privacy, publicity, moral rights) may limit use
The question uses contextual clues (an early-2000s UK UNIX tutorial and a canonical URL ending in '/by-nc-sa/2.0/') to require logical identification of the exact Creative Commons license (Deep reasoning). It then demands a comprehensive synthesis of freedoms, conditions, notices about version updates, and disclaimers drawn from multiple sections of the official license deed and explanatory pages (Wide aggregation).
Judgment
Both agents correctly identified the license as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0), satisfying the Deep Logic requirement. However, on Width/Completeness, Agent A covers all checklist elements: Share and Adapt freedoms, irrevocability, Attribution, NonCommercial, ShareAlike, No Additional Restrictions, the public domain/exceptions carve-out, the 4.0 upgrade notice, and warranty/other-rights disclaimers. Agent B omits two required elements: the explicit 'No Additional Restrictions' clause and the statement that compliance is not required for public domain material or statutory exceptions. While Agent B has slightly stronger visual formatting and contextual detail, Agent A is more complete and fully aligned with the ground-truth checklist. Therefore, Agent A provides the better overall answer.
o3
OpenAI
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic