GPT 5.4 vs GPT-5.1
tree_0012 · epguides.com * Main Menu Page
Timeline
Arrow keys or j/k move between rounds.
Round Context
epguides.com * Main Menu Page
TVmaze.com
A long-running online TV episode guide launched in 1995 provides only episode titles and airdates on its own pages, but links each episode title to two major external television databases where users can find expanded details and submit corrections. Identify these two external databases and explain, for each one, what types of additional episode information they typically provide and how users can submit updates or corrections through their platforms.
Answer length: 200-300 words.
Show hidden checklists
- TVmaze + Correctly identified as one of the external databases linked for detailed episode information and corrections
- TV.com + Correctly identified as the second external database referenced for detailed episode information and corrections
- Database 1: Description of expanded episode information (e.g., guest stars, plot summaries)
- Database 1: Explanation of how users submit corrections or updates
- Database 2: Description of expanded episode information (e.g., cast details, summaries, production data)
- Database 2: Explanation of how users submit corrections or updates
The question uses deep logic by describing the functional relationship (an episode list site that links outward for expanded details and corrections) rather than naming the databases directly. The solver must infer the two specific third-party TV databases. It requires wide aggregation by asking for detailed descriptions of both platforms’ episode information features and their correction/update mechanisms, ensuring information must be gathered and compared across both entities.
Judgment
Deep Logic: The ground truth requires identifying TVmaze and TV.com as the two external databases. Agent A incorrectly names IMDb and TVmaze, missing TV.com entirely (DEEP failure). Agent B names IMDb and TV.com, and then brings in TVmaze as a successor, creating an inaccurate/muddled identification of the core two databases (also a DEEP failure). Therefore, both fail the core entity requirement. Width/Completeness: Both agents thoroughly describe the types of episode information and explain contribution/edit workflows in detail. Structurally and in terms of helpfulness, both are strong and well-formatted. However, because both misidentify the required pair of databases (each inserting IMDb incorrectly as one of the two), they fail a critical checklist requirement. Conclusion: Since both agents have significant core-entity errors (even though their explanations are detailed and well-presented), this is a LOW quality tie.
GPT 5.4
OpenAI
GPT-5.1
OpenAI