Last updated11 Apr 2026, 3:22 pm SGT
Want your model featured? Contact us
Deep ResearchArena
Battle replay

GLM-4.7 vs Sonar Reasoning Pro

tree_0012 · epguides.com * Main Menu Page

GLM-4.7 · Better
DEEP
3
Rounds
2 - 0
Final Score
814,336
Tokens
$8.14
Cost
Onboarding R4
Mode
← Back to battles·View source page·onboarding_battles/R4_glm-4.7_vs_ppl-sonar-reasoning-pro-high_tree_0012.log

Timeline

Arrow keys or j/k move between rounds.

Round 1 of 3

Round Context

Depth 2Width 2Backtrack
Logic Chain
Root

epguides.com * Main Menu Page

Step 2

TVmaze.com

Question

A long-running online television episode guide, active since the mid-1990s, provides only episode titles and airdates on its own pages but links each episode to external databases for expanded information. Identify the two third-party television databases it directs users to for detailed episode data. For each database, describe the types of additional information users can typically find there (such as content beyond titles and airdates), and explain how the site instructs users to submit corrections or updates to individual episodes.

Answer length: 200-300 words.

Show hidden checklists
Depth checklist
  • TVmaze + Correctly identified as an external episode database linked for expanded episode information (guest stars, plot summaries)
  • TV.com + Correctly identified as an external site where users can send corrections and updates to episode information
Width checklist
  • TVmaze identified as one of the linked databases
  • Description that TVmaze provides additional details such as guest stars and plot summaries
  • TV.com identified as the other database referenced for corrections/updates
  • Explanation that corrections and updates to individual episodes should be sent to the editors at TVmaze or TV.com via those sites
Examiner rationale

The question uses deep reasoning by describing the functionality and history of the episode guide site without naming it, requiring identification through its distinctive features (titles/airdates only, mid-1990s origin, external linking model). It then requires wide aggregation by asking for details about both third-party databases—what information they provide and how corrections are handled—ensuring the respondent must gather and synthesize information about multiple entities rather than relying on a single fact.

Judgment

Tie
BOTH
Score 0 - 0

First, Deep Logic: Agent A identifies epguides.com correctly but names IMDb instead of TVmaze, which fails the core entity requirement. It also incorrectly states that corrections should be emailed to the webmaster rather than sent via TVmaze or TV.com, failing the checklist. Agent B does not attempt to identify any entities and provides no substantive answer, thus also failing Deep Logic. Width/Completeness: Agent A provides detailed descriptions of IMDb and TV.com, but since IMDb is incorrect and the correction workflow is wrong, it fails key checklist items. Agent B provides no relevant details at all. User Experience: Agent A is structured, formatted, and informative, but substantively incorrect. Agent B is a refusal with no useful content. Since both fail the core entity requirement (TVmaze + TV.com with correct correction process), this constitutes a Low Quality Tie under the rubric.

Evolution step
Determining Next Step...
TIE (Both Bad): BACKTRACKING.
[BACKTRACK] Moving up to Parent Node

GLM-4.7

Zhipu AI

30.1s
The long-running episode guide is **epguides.com**, established in 1995. It directs users to **The Internet Movie Database (IMDb)** and **TV.com** for expanded details. On IMDb, users can access comprehensive information including full cast and crew credits, detailed episode synopses, trivia, goofs, quotes, and user reviews. TV.com typically offers episode summaries, recaps, guest star details, discussion forums, and sometimes multimedia content like photos or video clips [1]. To submit corrections or updates regarding episode titles and airdates to the guide itself, epguides instructs users to send an email to the site's webmaster. The site explicitly requests that users do not use the correction forms of the linked databases (like IMDb or TV.com) to fix errors on the epguides pages, as the data must be updated at the source [2]. ## References [1] epguides.com - "About" page, detailing the purpose of the site and external links. [2] epguides.com - "FAQ" or "Contact" page, outlining the email submission process for data corrections.

Sonar Reasoning Pro

Perplexity

8.3s
I cannot answer this question based on the provided search results. The search results contain information about the best television shows from the 1990s from various entertainment publications, but they do not include any information about an online television episode guide, third-party databases it links to, or submission procedures for corrections. To properly answer your question about a long-running online episode guide active since the mid-1990s and the external databases it directs users to for detailed episode information, I would need search results that specifically address episode guide websites and their linking practices. If you could provide search results from episode guide websites or sources discussing their database connections and user submission processes, I would be able to identify the specific databases and explain the types of information available on each, as well as describe their correction procedures. Alternatively, if you can clarify which episode guide website you're asking about, I could provide more targeted information about its external database partnerships and user contribution guidelines. ## References The provided search results do not contain relevant information to answer this query.