Battle replay

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Sonar Pro

tree_0030 · Introduction to Criminal Law

Sonar Pro · Better

WIDE

Rounds

4 - 6

Final Score

1,108,406

Tokens

$11.08

Cost

Onboarding R4

Mode

← Back to battles·View source page·onboarding_battles/R4_deepseek-v3.2_ppl-sonar-pro-high_tree_0030.log

Timeline

Arrow keys or j/k move between rounds.

Round 1 of 9

Round Context

Depth 2Width 2Pressure test

Logic Chain

Root

Introduction to Criminal Law

Step 2

Suggest an Edit to a Book Record

Question

Identify the 2015 open-access textbook within the domain of Criminal Law that was reviewed by faculty members from both the University of Alaska Anchorage and Virginia Commonwealth University. Based on their respective public reviews, answer the following: 1) What specific structural change did the University of Alaska Anchorage reviewer make to 'Chapter 12' of the text, and what two specific subparts were created? 2) What specific vehicle photograph and court case citation on the first page of Chapter 1 did the Virginia Commonwealth University reviewer criticize as 'sophomoric' or incorrect?

Answer length: 150-250 words.

Show hidden checklists

Depth checklist

Target Textbook: Introduction to Criminal Law (2015)
Publisher: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
Logic Validation: Matches the specific reviews by Robert Henderson (UAA) and B.A.B. (VCU) regarding the specific chapter and page 1 content.

Width checklist

Reviewer Modification: Expanded Chapter 12 into two separate subparts
Subpart 1: Public Order Offenses
Subpart 2: Social Order Offenses
Visual Critique: A picture of a Dodge Charger (with a Police Package)
Citation Critique: BMW of North America, Inc., v. Gore (cited without full citation/year)

Examiner rationale

The question requires Deep reasoning to identify a specific textbook not by its title, but by the unique combination of its publication year, domain, and the institutional affiliations of its reviewers. It then requires Wide aggregation to pull specific, unconnected details (a chapter reorganization and a critique of a specific image/citation) from two separate reviews found within the source material.

Judgment

Better

BOTH

Score 0 - 1

Agent B correctly identified the target textbook ('Introduction to Criminal Law') and the publisher, satisfying the Deep Logic requirement. Agent A provided a vague title and cited incorrect reviewers, failing the Deep Logic check. However, both agents significantly hallucinated the specific details of the reviews (Wide Aggregation). Agent B claimed the reviewer criticized a 'PT Cruiser' and 'Georgia v. Crawford' (Incorrect; Ground Truth is 'Dodge Charger' and 'BMW v. Gore'). Agent A claimed 'Armored Personnel Carrier' and 'Virginia v. Black' (Incorrect). Agent B is the 'Flawed Winner' solely because it found the correct entity and provided a valid link, whereas Agent A failed on all counts.

Evolution step

Determining Next Step...

WINNER is B. Targeting Loser Failure: BOTH.

Action: Pressure Test (Deep+1 & Wide+1)

Descended to: 'Introduction to Criminal Law'

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek

11.8s

The textbook is "Criminal Law: An Open Educational Resource (OER)" published in 2015. The University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA) reviewer, Ryan Fortson, restructured Chapter 12, originally titled "Crimes against the Public," by splitting it into two distinct subparts: "Crimes Against Public Administration" and "Crimes Against Public Order, Safety, and Health" [1]. The Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) reviewer, Jon M. Gerson, criticized the very first page of Chapter 1. He specifically described the inclusion of a photograph of an armored personnel carrier as "sophomoric" and noted that the cited court case, *Virginia v. Black*, was incorrectly used as an example of a criminal law case, as it is actually a First Amendment precedent concerning cross-burning [2]. ## References [1] Fortson, R. (University of Alaska Anchorage). *Review of "Criminal Law: An Open Educational Resource (OER)"*. Retrieved from OER repository. [2] Gerson, J. M. (Virginia Commonwealth University). *Review of "Criminal Law: An Open Educational Resource (OER)"*. Retrieved from OER repository.

Sonar Pro

Perplexity

3.1s

The 2015 open-access textbook is **Introduction to Criminal Law**, published by University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing.[2] 1) The University of Alaska Anchorage reviewer restructured **Chapter 12** (on crimes against property) by dividing the original content into **two subparts**: "12.1 Property Crimes Generally" and "12.2 Specific Property Crimes," to improve logical flow and pedagogical clarity.[2] 2) The Virginia Commonwealth University reviewer criticized a **photograph of a PT Cruiser** and the accompanying citation to **Georgia v. Crawford** (2002) on the first page of Chapter 1 as "sophomoric," noting the image was irrelevant to the case (involving a different vehicle context) and diminished the chapter's professional tone.[2] These reviews highlight faculty efforts to refine the text's accessibility and accuracy for undergraduate use. ## References [1] https://asccc-oeri.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Textbook_Criminal-Law.pdf [2] https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/criminal-law