Grok 4 vs o3
tree_0015 · Contact Lenses: Types and How They Work
Timeline
Arrow keys or j/k move between rounds.
Round Context
Contact Lenses: Types and How They Work
Virtual Second Opinions
Identify the specific virtual second opinion service offered through the joint venture between Cleveland Clinic and Amwell. Based on the program's geographic restrictions, explicitly detail the available service tiers (e.g., Concierge vs. Concierge Plus) and their associated self-pay costs for patients residing in **Florida**, **Oklahoma**, and **Maine**. Additionally, determine the service eligibility for a patient attempting to access this program from **Australia**.
Answer length: 200-300 words.
Show hidden checklists
- Target Entity: Virtual Second Opinions by The Clinic (Cleveland Clinic + Amwell)
- Logic Proof: Correctly maps Florida to the 'Virtual visit + written report' list
- Logic Proof: Correctly maps Oklahoma to the 'Written Report option' list
- Logic Proof: Correctly maps Maine to the excluded states list
- Logic Proof: Correctly maps Australia to the excluded countries list
- Identifies Florida as eligible for 'Concierge Plus' (Virtual Visit + Written Report) and 'Concierge' (Written Report Only)
- States Florida costs: $1,990 for Concierge Plus, $1,690 for Concierge
- Identifies Oklahoma as eligible for 'Concierge' (Written Report Only)
- States Oklahoma cost: $1,690
- Identifies Maine as ineligible for VSO (must seek in-person opinion)
- Identifies Australia as ineligible for international service
The question uses deep logic by masking the specific service tiers and requiring the agent to identify the program first. It is 'wide' because it forces the agent to aggregate information across four distinct geographic categories (Full Service State, Report-Only State, Excluded State, Excluded Country) to provide a complete answer based on the scattered lists in the source text.
Judgment
Both agents failed significant portions of the Ground Truth checklist, specifically regarding the exclusion of Maine (both claimed it was eligible) and the specific pricing (both were incorrect compared to the provided truth). However, Agent B is the winner because it correctly identified the logic restriction for Oklahoma (stating that 'Concierge Plus' is not offered there), whereas Agent A incorrectly claimed there were 'no state-specific exclusions' and that the service was available in 'all 50 states.' Agent B also utilized a superior formatting structure (bullet points by state) that made the complex geographic restrictions much easier to digest than Agent A's dense paragraph.
Grok 4
xAI
o3
OpenAI