Qwen3-235B vs Seed 1.6
tree_0014 · Video rental shop
Timeline
Arrow keys or j/k move between rounds.
Round Context
Video rental shop
In a Copyright Ruling, the Legacy of the Betamax
Identify the 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that is frequently cited as the historical antecedent to the 2013 decision involving Supap Kirtsaeng and the resale of textbooks. Regarding that 1984 case, identify the Supreme Court Justice who reportedly switched their vote at the last minute, effectively saving the technology involved. Furthermore, provide the exact analogy used by the head of the Motion Picture Association of America describing the threat of this technology to the film industry, and name the specific copyright doctrine that subsequently protected the business models of video rental chains like Blockbuster and Redbox.
Answer length: 200-300 words.
Show hidden checklists
- Case Identification: Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. (or the Betamax case)
- Logic Proof: The agent must link the 2013 Kirtsaeng textbook case to the 1984 Betamax case to answer the subsequent details.
- Justice Name: Sandra Day O'Connor
- Quote: 'The VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone.'
- Legal Doctrine: The doctrine of 'first sale' (or First Sale Doctrine)
The question requires Deep reasoning to identify the 1984 case (Betamax) solely through its comparative relationship to the 2013 Kirtsaeng case mentioned in the text. It then requires Wide aggregation to retrieve three distinct, scattered facts: the specific Justice's action, a specific quote by an industry leader, and the specific legal doctrine affecting the video rental domain.
Judgment
Both agents correctly identified the core case (Sony v. Universal) and the relevant quote and legal doctrine (First Sale). However, Agent A correctly identified Justice Sandra Day O'Connor as the specific Justice who switched her vote/was the swing vote (matching the Ground Truth), whereas Agent B incorrectly identified Justice Lewis Powell. Agent A wins on accuracy. Both agents failed the formatting criteria (using dense walls of text instead of headers/bullets), which prevents Agent A from receiving a 'Much Better' score.
Qwen3-235B
Alibaba
Seed 1.6
ByteDance