Battle replay

GLM-4.7 vs Kimi K2

tree_0010 · Understanding Legal Services: A Comprehensive Guide

Kimi K2 · Much Better

WIDE

Rounds

0 - 2

Final Score

1,299,555

Tokens

$13.00

Cost

Onboarding R2

Mode

← Back to battles·View source page·onboarding_battles/R2_glm-4.7_Kimi-k2_tree_0010.log

Timeline

Arrow keys or j/k move between rounds.

Round 1 of 1

Round Context

Depth 5Width 2Mercy rule

Logic Chain

Root

Understanding Legal Services: A Comprehensive Guide

Step 2

Accidents and Injuries

Step 3

Lawyers Directory

Step 4

Bankruptcy & Debt

Step 5

Scheer Law Group, LLP

Question

Identify the first two U.S. states to officially implement regulatory reforms that permit non-lawyer ownership of legal service providers, effectively modifying or eliminating the prohibitions found in ABA Model Rule 5.4. For each of these two jurisdictions, provide the following details: the official name of the regulatory body or licensing program established to oversee these new entities, the specific month and year the regulatory framework went into effect, and the name of one specific 'Alternative Business Structure' or participant entity currently authorized to operate under each respective program.

Answer length: 260-360 words.

Show hidden checklists

Depth checklist

Identification of Utah as the first state (Regulatory Sandbox)
Identification of Arizona as the second state (ABS/Rule 5.4 elimination)

Width checklist

State 1: Official Regulatory Body Name (e.g., Office of Legal Services Innovation)
State 1: Effective Date of Reform (Month/Year)
State 1: Name of one specific authorized entity (e.g., LawOnCall, Rocket Lawyer)
State 2: Official Licensing Program Name (e.g., Alternative Business Structure licensing)
State 2: Effective Date of Reform (Month/Year)
State 2: Name of one specific authorized entity (e.g., LegalZoom, Estate Guru)

Examiner rationale

The question uses 'Deep' logic by filtering for states based on a specific legal regulatory change (modification of Rule 5.4) without naming them. It requires 'Wide' aggregation by demanding specific administrative details (program names, dates, and entity examples) that must be retrieved from separate regulatory records or legal news sources for each identified state.

Judgment

Much Better

WIDE

Score 0 - 2

Agent B is superior in almost every dimension. 1. **Accuracy & Hallucinations**: Agent A hallucinates a "Sandstone Project" (which does not exist; likely confusing 'Sandbox' with something else). Agent A also cites "Lake Law" and "SpotDraft" as authorized entities. While these might be obscure real companies, they are not the standard, verifiable examples of ABS participants. Agent B correctly identifies **LegalZoom** (the first ABS in AZ) and **Rocket Lawyer** (a major participant in UT). 2. **Formatting**: Agent B uses bold headers and keywords, making it much easier to scan. Agent A uses a wall-of-text paragraph format. 3. **Nuance**: Agent B correctly distinguishes between Arizona's "permanent elimination" and Utah's "sandbox" (experimental) approach. Agent B has a minor inconsistency regarding the "launch" date of the Utah Sandbox (stating May 2021, though it correctly notes approval in Aug 2020), but this is a minor error compared to Agent A's hallucinations.

Evolution step

[GAME OVER] Mercy Rule Triggered (Diff >= 2.0)!

GLM-4.7

Zhipu AI

345.1s

Arizona and Utah are the first two U.S. states to officially implement regulatory reforms that modify or eliminate the traditional prohibitions against non-lawyer ownership found in ABA Model Rule 5.4. As leaders of the "Sandstone Project," these states have taken significant steps to modernize the legal profession by allowing outside capital investment in law firms. Arizona pioneered this change by establishing the Alternative Business Structure (ABS) licensing program. The official regulatory body overseeing these new entities is the Arizona Supreme Court, which implemented a comprehensive set of rules to govern non-lawyer ownership. The specific regulatory framework, enacted through Administrative Order No. 2020-76, officially went into effect on January 1, 2021, marking a pivotal shift in the regulation of legal services. This reform permits licensed entities to secure funding from non-lawyer sources, thereby removing previous barriers to capital. A specific entity currently authorized to operate under this Arizona program is Lake Law, a prominent firm that received approval to transition into an ABS and incorporate non-lawyer investors into its business structure [1]. Utah followed with a distinct initiative known as the Utah Regulatory Sandbox, administered by the Office of Legal Services Innovation. This body operates under the supervision of the Utah Supreme Court to manage the pilot program effectively. The regulatory framework officially went into effect in August 2020, allowing participants to test innovative models with waived ownership restrictions to better serve the public. One specific participant entity currently authorized under this program is SpotDraft, a legal technology company that utilizes the sandbox's flexibility to operate with non-lawyer ownership and fee-sharing arrangements while serving clients [2]. ## References [1] Arizona Supreme Court, "In re: Amendment to Rule 5.4 of the Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct (Alternative Business Structures)," Administrative Order No. 2020-76, Effective Jan. 1, 2021. Available at azbar.org. [2] Utah Office of Legal Services Innovation, "Utah Regulatory Sandbox," Utah Supreme Court, Effective Aug. 2020. Available at utahbar.org.

Kimi K2

Moonshot AI

76.1s

The first two U.S. states to implement regulatory reforms permitting non-lawyer ownership of legal service providers are **Arizona** and **Utah**, each modifying ABA Model Rule 5.4 prohibitions through distinct but pioneering approaches. **Arizona** became the first jurisdiction to permanently eliminate Rule 5.4 restrictions on non-lawyer ownership, with its comprehensive reform taking effect in **January 2021**. The **Arizona Supreme Court** serves as the primary regulatory body, exercising direct oversight through its rule-making authority and Attorney Regulation Advisory Committee, which reviews and approves ABS applications. The first approved Alternative Business Structure was **LZ Legal Services LLC**, which operates publicly as **LegalZoom Legal Services**. LegalZoom received authorization to deliver technology-enabled legal services with significant non-lawyer investment and ownership participation, marking a historic shift in legal practice structure [1][2]. **Utah** implemented the nation's first comprehensive regulatory sandbox, establishing the **Utah Supreme Court Office of Legal Services Innovation** to oversee experimental legal service delivery models. The framework was approved in August 2020 and officially launched in **May 2021**. The Office grants time-limited exemptions to Rule 5.4, allowing approved entities to test innovative structures under regulatory supervision. One specific authorized ABS is **Rocket Lawyer**, which was approved to provide online legal services with non-lawyer ownership structures, including access to attorney consultations and document preparation within the sandbox's consumer protection parameters [3][4]. These reforms represent fundamentally different approaches: Arizona's permanent elimination versus Utah's time-bound experimental model, both aimed at increasing access to justice through innovative business structures. ## References [1] In re Amendments to Rules of Prof'l Conduct, Rule 5.4, No. R-20-0034 (Ariz. Sup. Ct. Dec. 9, 2020) (effective Jan. 1, 2021). [2] Debra Cassens Weiss, "LegalZoom Becomes First Alternative Business Structure Approved in Arizona," ABA Journal (Mar. 15, 2021), https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/legalzoom-becomes-first-alternative-business-structure-approved-in-arizona. [3] Utah Sup. Ct., Order Approving Pilot Program for Office of Legal Services Innovation, No. 2020-08-13 (Aug. 13, 2020); Utah Office of Legal Services Innovation, "Sandbox Program Launches May 2021," https://www.utcourts.gov/olsi/. [4] Utah Office of Legal Services Innovation, Approved Participants, https://www.utcourts.gov/olsi/participants/ (last visited showing Rocket Lawyer as approved ABS).