Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Sonar Pro
tree_0029 · Handball
Timeline
Arrow keys or j/k move between rounds.
Round Context
Handball
Чемпионат России по гандболу среди мужчин — Википедия
Identify all clubs that have won the top-tier Russian men’s handball championship at least twice since the competition began in 1992. For each of these clubs, provide: (1) their home city, (2) the total number of championship titles they have won, and (3) the most recent season in which they became champions (up to and including the 2024/25 season).
Answer length: 200-300 words.
Show hidden checklists
- Chekhovskie Medvedi – Verified as champions 21 times (≥2 titles requirement satisfied)
- Kaustik (Volgograd) – Verified as champions 4 times (≥2 titles requirement satisfied)
- Zenit (Saint Petersburg) – Verified as champions 2 times (≥2 titles requirement satisfied)
- CSKA (since 2017, Moscow) – Verified as champions 2 times (≥2 titles requirement satisfied)
- CSKA (1969–1998, Moscow) – Verified as champions 2 times (≥2 titles requirement satisfied)
- CSKA-Sportakadem (Moscow) – Verified as champions 2 times (≥2 titles requirement satisfied)
- Chekhovskie Medvedi – Home city (Chekhov)
- Chekhovskie Medvedi – Total titles (21)
- Chekhovskie Medvedi – Most recent title season (2021/22)
- Kaustik – Home city (Volgograd)
- Kaustik – Total titles (4)
- Kaustik – Most recent title season (1998/99)
- Zenit – Home city (Saint Petersburg)
- Zenit – Total titles (2)
- Zenit – Most recent title season (2024/25)
- CSKA (club existing since 2017) – Home city (Moscow)
- CSKA (since 2017) – Total titles (2)
- CSKA (since 2017) – Most recent title season (2023/24)
- CSKA (1969–1998 club) – Home city (Moscow)
- CSKA (1969–1998) – Total titles (2)
- CSKA (1969–1998) – Most recent title season (1994/95)
- CSKA-Sportakadem – Home city (Moscow)
- CSKA-Sportakadem – Total titles (2)
- CSKA-Sportakadem – Most recent title season (2000/01)
The question uses a logical filter (clubs with at least two championship titles since 1992) to require identification of multiple qualifying entities without naming them directly (Deep). It then requires aggregation of several distinct facts for each club—city, total titles, and most recent winning season—necessitating comparison across historical records and season-by-season data (Wide).
Judgment
First, Deep Logic: Agent A identifies multiple legitimate championship clubs (Chekhovskie Medvedi, CSKA, Kaustik), meaning it recognizes the correct competition and core entities, even though incomplete. Agent B incorrectly claims only one club has won at least twice, which fundamentally contradicts the historical record. Thus, B fails Deep Logic. Second, Width/Completeness: Agent A omits several required clubs (Zenit, CSKA-Sportakadem, separate CSKA eras) and contains inaccuracies (Chekhov’s most recent season, incorrect CSKA total aggregation). Agent B fails even more severely by missing nearly all qualifying clubs and providing incorrect totals and seasons. Both fail WIDE, but B’s omissions are far more extreme. Finally, User Experience: Agent A is structured, uses bullet points, provides context, and attempts historical clarification. Agent B is shorter and clearly structured, but its core claim is factually wrong and dismisses other valid clubs, severely harming usefulness. Because Agent A still contains factual errors, it cannot receive MUCH_BETTER. However, Agent B fails both Deep and Wide dimensions catastrophically. Therefore, Agent A is BETTER overall.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Sonar Pro
Perplexity